How to Build an AI Lead Scoring System in 2026
Firmographic fit, behavioural signals and intent data combined into a model that routes high-probability buyers to sales automatically.
Read article →Zapier, Make and n8n all solve the same fundamental problem: connecting apps that do not talk to each other. The difference is in how much complexity they handle, how much they cost at scale, and how much technical skill they require. Choosing the wrong tool is expensive, either in money (Zapier at high volume), time (n8n without a developer), or limitations (Zapier for complex multi-path logic).
Zapier: the right tool for simple, fast automations
Zapier built its reputation on being the easiest automation tool to use. Its Zap builder is genuinely simple: pick a trigger, pick an action, connect your accounts. For common two-step automations (new HubSpot contact creates a Slack notification, new Stripe payment adds a row to Google Sheets), Zapier is the fastest tool to implement and the easiest to maintain.
Where Zapier falls short: multi-path logic (doing different things based on conditions), high-volume workflows (it becomes expensive fast above 10,000 tasks per month), and complex data transformation. At £20 to £100 per month for typical business usage, it is also the most expensive of the three on a per-operation basis at higher volumes.
Use Zapier when: you need something working in 30 minutes, your workflows are simple (2 to 4 steps), and volume is low. Ideal for non-technical founders who need quick integrations between SaaS tools.
Make: the visual powerhouse for complex workflows
Make (formerly Integromat) is the tool most Koldconvert clients upgrade to when they outgrow Zapier. Its visual canvas approach, where you can see the full workflow as a diagram, makes it easier to reason about complex multi-step processes. Make handles conditional logic, iterators (processing arrays of items), error handling, and parallel branches natively, without requiring code.
Make is also significantly cheaper than Zapier at volume. For teams running 50,000 to 200,000 operations per month, Make typically costs 3 to 5 times less. Its pricing is based on operations (each action in a scenario) rather than tasks, which rewards efficient scenario design.
Use Make when: you need multi-branch conditional logic, you are processing moderate to high volumes, you want a visual interface without needing to write code, and you are building workflows that will run continuously and need monitoring. The standard choice for marketing automation, CRM sync, and outbound data pipelines at scale.
n8n: maximum flexibility for technical teams
n8n is the most powerful of the three and the most technical. It can be self-hosted (entirely on your own infrastructure) or used via n8n Cloud. The self-hosted version is free and handles unlimited workflows, making it the cheapest option at very high volumes for teams with a developer to set it up and maintain it.
n8n's key differentiator is its Code node, which lets you write JavaScript or Python directly within a workflow step. This makes it suitable for building genuinely custom logic that neither Zapier nor Make can handle. For AI agent pipelines that require custom processing, data transformation or API calls to models like Claude or GPT-4o, n8n is the tool of choice among technical teams.
Use n8n when: you have a developer, you need self-hosted automation for data privacy, you are building AI agent workflows with custom code, or you are processing very high volumes where per-operation pricing would be prohibitive.
How they compare on key dimensions
Ease of use: Zapier is easiest, Make is moderate, n8n requires technical knowledge.
Cost at scale: n8n self-hosted is cheapest, Make is mid-range, Zapier is most expensive.
Workflow complexity: n8n handles the most complexity, Make is close behind, Zapier is limited to simpler logic.
AI integration: All three now have AI nodes. n8n has the most flexibility for custom AI agent builds. Make has the most polished out-of-the-box AI integrations. Zapier's AI features are the most beginner-friendly.
Most growing teams follow the same path: Zapier for early quick wins, Make when complexity increases, n8n when they hire their first developer and need maximum control.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: n8n, Make or Zapier?
n8n self-hosted is free for unlimited workflows (plus server costs). Make is typically 3 to 5 times cheaper than Zapier at high volume. At 100,000 plus operations per month, n8n self-hosted is almost always cheapest for teams with a developer.
Can I use Make or Zapier without coding?
Yes. Zapier requires no code for its core functionality. Make handles conditional logic and complex workflows without code via its visual canvas. n8n is more technical and benefits significantly from programming knowledge for advanced uses.
When should I choose n8n over Make or Zapier?
When you need self-hosted automation for compliance, are building AI agent pipelines with custom code, have developers on your team, or process very high volumes where per-operation pricing becomes expensive.